Last month, Judy and I got the idea in our heads to test our
DNA, via a sibling test, to see what it would show with regard to our
relationship. There was no ulterior motive,
beyond curiosity on our part. We deliberated
the ramifications before hand, and determined that ultimately it didn’t actually
matter what the test revealed, that things are as they are, and no test was
really going to alter any perception on either of our parts.
We got the data back this week, and while most of it was extraordinarily
technical unless you are a geneticist, I compiled the following “simplistic”
breakdown in as plain English of what it revealed:
The theoretical ideal “sibship” index between two unrelated
random individuals is 1. A sibship index
greater than 1 indicates a higher
likelihood of sibship. A sibship index lower than 1 indicates a higher
likelihood of non-sibship.
Based on the genetic testing analysis by PCR of STR loci
(specifically examined DNA location matches), sibship matches for “Judy” and “Ray”
calculated as full siblings as follows:
DNA Location Judy Ray
Match
D8S1179 13,15 13,15
exact
D21S11 29,30 27,30
exact
D7S820 11,12 12,14 very close
CSF1PO 12 12
exact
D3S1358 16,17 16,17
exact
TH01 9.3 9.3
exact
D13S317 11 11,13 very close
D16S539 12 12,13 very close
D2S1338 17 17
exact
D19S433 13,14 13,14 exact
vWA 16,19 16,19
exact
TPOX 8 8
exact
D18S51 13,17 13,18 very
close
D5S818 12,13 12,13
exact
FGA 21,24 22,24 very close
As you can see, ten of the fifteen location samples in the
table above matched exactly, while
the remaining five were very close. This
indicates that our Combined full-sibship index is 125,219.00 (in other words,
the probability of us being full
siblings is 99.999%). Additionally, our
half-sibship index is 828.32 (in other words, the probability of us being half siblings is 99.8%).
So, are we true siblings?
Well, the greater the sibling index value over 1.0, the higher the
likelihood that the two individuals are related as siblings. Our sibling index
value came in at 125,219.
If a sibling pair has a sibling index value that is 10, that
suggests that they are 10 times more likely to be true biological siblings than
not siblings. If a sibling pair has a sibling index value of 100, that suggests
that they are 100 times more likely to be true biological siblings than not
siblings. Our numbers suggest that we are 125,219 times more likely to be full
biological siblings than not.
Are we full or half siblings? If the full sibling index value is greater
than the half sibling index value, then the individuals are more likely to be
full siblings. If the half sibling index value is greater than the full sibling
index value, then the individuals are more likely to be half siblings. Our full sibling index value came in at 125,219. Our half sibling value came in at 828.32.
This means that if a sibling pair has a full sibling index
value of 100 and a half sibling index value of 2, then they are more likely to
be full siblings than half siblings. A comparison of our full versus the half
sibling index values (125,219 / 828.32= 151.17), indicating that our full
sibling index value is 151.17 times greater than our half sibling index value,
indicating that our sibling pair is 151.17 times more likely to be full
siblings than half siblings.
So what does all of this mean? To be honest, absolutely nothing, and yet... absolutely
everything. It means that Judy and I test
as full-blood brother and sister, validating
what we knew in our hearts all along.
No comments:
Post a Comment