Wednesday, March 27, 2024

Political Cheat Sheet- 2024 Cycle

Generally, I try to re-post this entry at the head of upcoming election cycles (when I remember). Most of these issues/views stand the same. At any rate, it will give you an idea as to how things work, should you be interested in pursuing the issues of the upcoming election, as opposed to the rhetoric of being "for" President Trump and voting red, or being "against" President Trump and voting blue:

In the wake of all of this business about pandemics, government shutdowns, debt ceilings, and partisan politics, it behooves us to know where we stand— at all times— on the issues.  What exactly is a conservative?   What is a liberal?  What is a moderate? Left?  Right? Middle? Blue? Red? Purple?  And to which side do the Democrats lean?  How about the Republicans?  Libertarians? Tea Party Patriots? That sounds like fun!  Who doesn’t like tea, for God’s sake…

liberal, by definition, is someone who is, “…not opposed to new ideas or ways of behaving that are not traditional or widely accepted” (merriam-webster.com). Liberals tend to believe in social welfare— that is, things are generally a societal responsibility, as opposed to an individual responsibility.  They are referred to as “left wing.”  An extreme liberal is called a revolutionary.

Conservatives,on the other hand, tend to be more orthodox with their philosophies, “…believing in the value of established and traditional practices in politics and society” (ibid).   They tend to believe more in the individual— from rights to responsibilities— with less emphasis on the society.  They are referred to as “right wing.”  An extreme conservative is called a reactionary.

The terms right and left actually came from the French Revolution and were (and are) used to identify people at opposite ends of the political spectrum.  Apparently, in the Legislative Assembly chambers of Paris, those representatives who sat to the right were supporters of the “powers that be,” while those who sat to the left were supporters of the merchant class, or common people (politicsreport.com).

How does this translate to 21st century American government?  Well, as the conservative philosophy leans towards more personal responsibility, they also tend to favor smaller government, or less involvement of government in people’s personal lives.  Liberals, on the other hand, favoring societal responsibility, tend to put more stock in government, believing that government should be more involved with the society that it governs.

Moderates generally fall in between, believing in a moderate or “middle” philosophy between the conservative and the liberal camps, tending towards, “…avoiding [the] extremes of behavior or expression” (merriam-webster.com), in this case, between the political philosophies of liberal and conservative.

Consequently, the Democratic Party in America is currently the liberal party, representing the interests of the left wing. Democratic states are represented by the color blue.  The Republican Party in America is currently the conservative party, representing the interests of the right wing.  Republican states are represented by the color red.  Purple states are what are called "battleground states," or states that could go either way. The colors have no significance of themselves; they were just a convenient way to show the tendencies of the states on a political map.  “Time” magazine is usually given credit for this distinction from the 1988 presidential election.

For the upcoming 2024 general election— a rematch of the 2020 showdown— the Republican ticket is represented by former President Donald Trump, and the Democrat ticket is represented by sitting President Joe Biden.

Issues
Here are some issues that Americans consider important.  They are listed in alphabetical order, with a brief explanation of the issue, and how each side of the political spectrum views each issue.  Special thanks to studentnewsdaily.com for the specific information.

Abortion- a voluntary medical procedure used to terminate a pregnancy.

Liberal: Pro.  The woman has the right to choose, and the government should protect that right, up to and including providing taxpayer-funded abortions for women who cannot afford them.  Further, a fetus is not a human life, and so does not have separate rights from the woman.  Women have the right to affordable, safe, and legal abortions, under any circumstances, including partial birth abortion.


Conservative: Con.  Human life begins at conception, and therefore abortion is the murder of a human being.  An unborn baby, as a living human being, has separate rights from those of the mother.  They oppose taxpayer-funded abortion, and support legislation to prohibit partial birth abortions.

Affirmative Action- federal laws that require companies (and schools) over a certain size to have a required percentage of minorities in their employment.

Liberal: Pro.  Due to prevalent racism in the past, minorities were deprived of the same education and employment opportunities as whites.  The government must work to make up for that.  America is still a racist society, therefore a federal affirmative action law is necessary.  Due to unequal opportunity, minorities still lag behind whites in all statistical measurements of success.

Conservative: Con. Individuals should be admitted to schools and hired for jobs based on their ability.  It is unfair to use race as a factor in the selection process.  Reverse-discrimination is not a solution for racism.  Some individuals in society are racist, but American society as a whole is not.  Preferential treatment of certain races through affirmative action is wrong.

Death Penalty- The legal execution of criminals found guilty of a capital crime (differs from state to state).

Liberal:
Con. The death penalty should be abolished.  It is inhumane and is ‘cruel and unusual' punishment.  Imprisonment is the appropriate punishment for murder.  Every execution risks killing an innocent person.

Conservative: Pro. The death penalty is a punishment that fits the crime of murder; it is neither ‘cruel' nor ‘unusual.'  Executing a murderer is the appropriate punishment for taking an innocent life.

Economy- “The production and consumption of goods and services, and the supply of money” (oxforddictionaries.com).

Liberal: A market system in which government regulates the economy is best.  Government must protect citizens from the greed of big business.  Unlike the private sector, the government is motivated by public interest.  Government regulation in all areas of the economy is needed to level the playing field.

Conservative: The free market system, competitive capitalism, and private enterprise create the greatest opportunity and the highest standard of living for all.  Free markets produce more economic growth, more jobs and higher standards of living than those systems burdened by excessive government regulation.

Education-(regarding vouchers & charter schools)

Liberal: 
Con. Public schools are the best way to educate students.  Vouchers take money away from public schools.  Government should focus additional funds on existing public schools, raising teacher salaries and reducing class size.

Conservative: Pro. School vouchers create competition and therefore encourage schools to improve performance.  Vouchers will give all parents the right to choose good schools for their children, not just those who can afford private schools.

Embryonic Stem Cell Researchresearch of the pre-developed cells of the human embryo that can potentially be used to culture any other type of cell in the human body.

Liberal- Pro. Support the use of embryonic stem cellsfor research.  It is necessary (and ethical) for the government to fund embryonicstem cell research, which will assist scientists in finding treatments and cures for diseases.  An embryo is not a human.  The tiny blastocyst (embryos used in embryonic stem cell research) has no human features.  Experimenting on embryos/embryonic stem cells is not murder.  Embryonic stem cellshave the potential to cure chronic and degenerative diseases which current medicine has been unable to effectively treat.  Embryonic stem cellshave been shown to be effective in treating heart damage in mice.

Conservative- Con. Support the use of adult and umbilical cord stem cells onlyfor research.  It is morally and ethically wrong for the government to fund embryonicstem cell research.  Human life begins at conception.  The extraction of stem cells from an embryo requires its destruction.  In other words, it requires that a human life be killed.  Adult stem cellshave already been used to treat spinal cord injuries, Leukemia, and even Parkinson's disease. Adult stem cells are derived from umbilical cords, placentas, amniotic fluid, various tissues and organ systems like skin and the liver, and even fat obtained from liposuction.  Embryonic stem cellshave not been successfully used to help cure disease.
  
Energy

Liberal- Oil is a depleting resource.  Other sources of energy must be explored.  The government must produce a national plan for all energy resources and subsidize (partially pay for) alternative energy research and production.  Support increased exploration of alternative energy sources such as wind and solar power.  Support government control of gas and electric industries.

Conservative- Oil, gas and coal are all good sources of energy and are abundant in the U.S.  Oil drilling should be increased both on land and at sea.  Increased domestic production creates lower prices and less dependence on other countries for oil.  Support increased production of nuclear energy.  Wind and solar sources will never provide plentiful, affordable sources of power.  Support private ownership of gas and electric industries.

Euthanasia & Physician-assisted suicide the legal termination of a terminal patient’s life; or the physician-assisted termination of a terminal patient’s life.

Liberal- Pro. Euthanasia should be legalized.  A person has a right to die with dignity, by his own choice.  A terminally ill person should have the right to choose to end pain and suffering.  It is wrong for the government to take away the means for a terminally ill person to hasten his death.  It is wrong to force a person to go through so much pain and suffering.  Legalizing euthanasia would not lead to doctor-assisted suicides of non-critical patients.  Permitting euthanasia would reduce health care costs, which would then make funds available for those who could truly benefit from medical care.

Conservative- Con. Neither euthanasia nor physician-assisted suicide should be legalized.  It is immoral and unethical to deliberately end the life of a terminally ill person (euthanasia), or enable another person to end their own life (assisted suicide).  The goal should be compassionate care and easing the suffering of terminally ill people.  Legalizing euthanasia could lead to doctor-assisted suicides of non-critical patients.  If euthanasia were legalized, insurance companies could pressure doctors to withhold life-saving treatment for dying patients.  Many religions prohibit suicide and euthanasia. These practices devalue human life.

Global Warming/Climate Change

Liberal- Global warming is caused by an increased production of carbon dioxide through the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas).  The U.S. is a major contributor to global warming because it produces 25% of the world’s carbon dioxide.  Proposed laws to reduce carbon emissions in the U.S. are urgently needed and should be enacted immediately to save the planet.  Many reputable scientists support this theory.

Conservative- Change in global temperature is natural over long periods of time.  Science has not shown that humans can affect permanent change to the earth’s temperature.  Proposed laws to reduce carbon emissions will do nothing to help the environment and will cause significant price increases for all.  Many reputable scientists support this theory.

 
Gun Controlthe right for a private citizen to own firearms.  For the record, the Second Amendment to the Constitution states:  “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Liberal- Con. The Second Amendment does not give citizens the right to keep and bear arms, but only allows for the state to keep a militia (National Guard).  Individuals do not need guns for protection; it is the role of local and federal government to protect the people through law enforcement agencies and the military.  Additional gun control laws are necessary to stop gun violence and limit the ability of criminals to obtain guns.  More guns mean more violence.

Conservative- Pro. The Second Amendment gives citizens the right to keep and bear arms.  Individuals have the right to defend themselves.  There are too many gun control laws – additional laws will not lower gun crime rates.  What is needed is enforcement of current laws.  Gun control laws do not prevent criminals from obtaining guns.  More guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens mean less crime.

Healthcare Government subsidized healthcare, aka socialized medicine.

Liberal- Pro.  Support free or low-cost government controlled health care.  There are millions of Americans who can’t afford health care and are deprived of this basic right.  Every American has a right to affordable health care.  The government should provide equal health care benefits for all, regardless of their ability to pay.

Conservative- Con. Support competitive, free market health care system.  All Americans have access to health care.  The debate is about who should pay for it.  Free and low-cost government-run programs (socialized medicine) result in higher costs and everyone receiving the same poor-quality health care.  Health care should remain privatized.  The problem of uninsured individuals should be addressed and solved within the free market healthcare system – the government should not control healthcare.

Homeland Securityspecifically TSA airport security “profiling” in the wake of 9/11.

Liberal- Con. Airport security – Passenger profiling is wrong, period.  Selection of passengers for extra security screening should be random.  Using other criteria (such as ethnicity) is discriminatory and offensive to Arabs and Muslims, who are generally innocent and law-abiding.  Terrorists don’t fit a profile.
“…Arabs, Muslims and South Asians are no more likely than whites to be terrorists.”(American Civil Liberties Union ACLU)
Asked on 60 Minutes if a 70-year-old white woman from Vero Beach should receive the same level of scrutiny as a Muslim from Jersey City, President Obama’s Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta said, “Basically, I would hope so.”

Conservative
Airport security – Choosing passengers randomly for extra security searches is not effective.  Rather, profiling and intelligence data should be used to single out passengers for extra screening.  Those who do not meet the criteria for suspicion should not be subjected to intense screening.  The terrorists currently posing a threat to the U.S. are primarily Islamic/Muslim men between the ages of 18 and 38.  Our resources should be focused on this group.  Profiling is good logical police work. 
“If people are offended (by profiling), that’s unfortunate, but I don’t think we can afford to take the risk that terrorism brings to us.  They’ve wasted masses of resources on far too many people doing things that really don’t have a big payoff in terms of security.”– Northwestern University Aviation Expert, A.Gellman.

Immigration

Liberal
Support legal immigration.  Support amnesty for those who enter the U.S. illegally (undocumented immigrants).  Also  believe that undocumented immigrants have a right to:
-- all educational and health benefits that citizens receive (financial aid, welfare, social security and medicaid), regardless of legal status.
-- the same rights as American citizens.  It is unfair to arrest millions of undocumented immigrants.

Conservative
Support legal immigration only.  Oppose amnesty for those who enter the U.S. illegally (illegal immigrants).  Those who break the law by entering the U.S. illegally do not have the same rights as those who obey the law and enter legally.  The borders should be secured before addressing the problem of the illegal immigrants currently in the country.  The Federal Government should secure the borders and enforce current immigration law.

Private Property

Liberal
Government has the right to use eminent domain (seizure of private property by the government--with compensation to the owner) to accomplish a public end.

Conservative
Respect ownership and private property rights.  Eminent domain (seizure of private property by the government--with compensation to the owner) in most cases is wrong.  Eminent domain should not be used for private development.

Religion & Government

Liberal
Support the separation of church and state.  The Bill of Rights implies a separation of church and state.  Religious expression has no place in government.  The two should be completely separate.  Government should not support religious expression in any way.  All reference to God in public and government spaces should be removed (eg., the Ten Commandments should not be displayed in Federal buildings).  Religious expression has no place in government.

Conservative
The phrase “separation of church and state”is not in the Constitution.  The First Amendment to the Constitution states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”  This prevents the government from establishing a national church/denomination. However, it does not prohibit God from being acknowledged in schools and government buildings.  Symbols of Christian heritage should not be removed from public and government spaces (eg., the Ten Commandments should continue to be displayed in Federal buildings).  Government should not interfere with religion and religious freedom.
  
Same-sex Marriage

Liberal
Marriage is the union of people who love each other.  It should be legal for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals, to ensure equal rights for all.  Support same-sex marriage.  Opposed to the creation of a constitutional amendment establishing marriage as the union of one man and one woman.  All individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation, have the right to marry.  Prohibiting same-sex citizens from marrying denies them their civil rights. [Opinions vary on whether this issue is equal to civil rights for African Americans.

Conservative
Marriage is the union of one man and one woman.  Oppose same-sex marriage.
Support Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), passed in 1996, which affirms the right of states not to recognize same-sex marriages licensed in other states.
Requiring citizens to sanction same-sex relationships violates moral and religious beliefs of millions of Christians, Jews, Muslims and others, who believe marriage is the union of one man and one woman.

Social Security

Liberal
The Social Security system should be protected at all costs.  Reduction in future benefits is not a reasonable option.  [Opinions vary on the extent of the current system's financial stability.]
Social Security provides a safety net for the nation's poor and needy.  Changing the system would cause a reduction in benefits and many people would suffer as a result.

Conservative
The Social Security system is in serious financial trouble.  Major changes to the current system are urgently needed.  In its current state, the Social Security system is not financially sustainable.  It will collapse if nothing is done to address the problems.  Many will suffer as a result.  Social Security must be made more efficient through privatization and/or allowing individuals to manage their own savings. 

Taxes
Liberal
Higher taxes (primarily for the wealthy) and a larger government are necessary to address inequity/injustice in society (government should help the poor and needy using tax dollars from the rich).  Support a large government to provide for the needs of the people and create equality.  Taxes enable the government to create jobs and provide welfare programs for those in need.  Government programs are a caring way to provide for the poor and needy in society.

Conservative
Lower taxes and a smaller government with limited power will improve the standard of living for all.  Support lower taxes and a smaller government.  Lower taxes create more incentive for people to work, save, invest, and engage in entrepreneurial endeavors.  Money is best spent by those who earn it, not the government.  Government programs encourage people to become dependent and lazy, rather than encouraging work and independence.

United Nations (UN)
Liberal
The UN promotes peace and human rights.  The United States has a moral and a legal obligation to support the United Nations (UN).  The U.S. should not act as a sovereign nation, but as one member of a world community.  The U.S. should submit its national interests to the greater good of the global community (as defined by the UN).  The U.S. should defer to the UN in military/peacekeeping matters.  The United Nations Charter gives the United Nations Security Council the power and responsibility to take collective action to maintain international peace and security.  U.S. troops should submit to UN command.
Conservative
The UN has repeatedly failed in its essential mission to promote world peace and human rights.  The wars, genocide and human rights abuses taking place in many Human Rights Council member states (and the UN's failure to stop them) prove this point.  History shows that the United States, not the UN, is the global force for spreading freedom, prosperity, tolerance and peace.  The U.S. should never subvert its national interests to those of the UN.  The U.S. should never place troops under UN control.  U.S. military should always wear the U.S. military uniform, not that of UN peacekeepers. [Opinions vary on whether the U.S. should withdraw from the UN.]

War on Terror/Terrorism

Liberal
Global warming, not terrorism, poses the greatest threat to the U.S., according to Democrats in Congress.  Terrorism is a result of arrogant U.S. foreign policy.  Good diplomacy is the best way to deal with terrorism.  Relying on military force to defeat terrorism creates hatred that leads to more terrorism.  Captured terrorists should be handled by law enforcement and tried in civilian courts.
Conservative
Terrorism poses one of the greatest threats to the U.S.  The world toward which the militant Islamists strive cannot peacefully co-exist with the Western world. In the last decade, militant Islamists have repeatedly attacked Americans and American interests here and abroad.  Terrorists must be stopped and destroyed.  The use of intelligence-gathering and military force are the best ways to defeat terrorism around the world.  Captured terrorists should be treated as enemy combatants and tried in military courts.

Welfare
Liberal
Support welfare, including long-term welfare.  Welfare is a safety net which provides for the needs of the poor.  Welfare is necessary to bring fairness to American economic life.  It is a device for protecting the poor.
Conservative
Oppose long-term welfare.  Opportunities should be provided to make it possible for those in need to become self-reliant.  It is far more compassionate and effective to encourage people to become self-reliant, rather than allowing them to remain dependent on the government for provisions.


© Ray Cattie

Monday, March 25, 2024

Twenty Years Later

 On the twentieth anniversary of the publishing of my first novel, "Ard Righ: The Sword on the Stone," just wanted to publish a reminder of my published works:

        "Ard Righ" (A Celtic Tale Book I)

         "Kingdom of Summer" (A Celtic Tale Book II) 

         "Reign of Fire" (A Celtic Tale Book III) 

         "Shadow of the Grail" (A Celtic Tale)

         "Messiah Helix" (A Novel of the Custodis Veritas) 

         "Knucklebones" (A collection of shorts)

         "Alone In a Crowd" (A chapbook of American poetry)
















All books are available in both trade paperback and e-book format via Amazon.com. Audio versions of “Ard Righ,” “Kingdom of Summer,” and “Messiah Helix” are additionally available via Audible.com. For more info visit my author page on Amazon.com, or my blog Ray’s Rhetoric at raycattie.blogspot.com, or my website at www.raycattie.com.

Thursday, November 2, 2023

“Now & Then”

Note: I wrote this entry back when the Beatles “new” song, “Now & Then,” was newly released. Though the day is November ‘23, I’m only getting around to publishing it now (March ‘24). It is a gut reaction to the music, and I have to say in the intervening months my opinion has mellowed slightly. While I still feel that it is a sub-par Beatles song, compared to everything else that passes as music today “Now & Then” is a relative masterpiece.

A remarkable track from the perspective of its creation, “Now and Then” is really a tribute more to Peter Jackson than to the Beatles. Fundamentally, the acclaimed director of “The Lord of the Rings” movies and lately “The Beatles: Get Back” sessions videos, “lifted” a John Lennon vocal track from a cassette recording from 1978 and, through the use of cutting-edged artificial intelligence, was able to fill in the gaps both on Lennon’s vocals and his piano. The result was truly an astonishing musical feat, particularly considering its origin as a John Lennon boombox mixtape of pre-“Double Fantasy” scraps. Peter Jackson gave the world one last Beatles song: “Now and Then.”


The remaining Beatles, Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr, along with Jackson’s production team and Giles Martin, son of former Beatle producer-extraordinaire George Martin,  also dusted off some George Harrison riffs from the ‘90s “Anthologies” sessions. The song was meant to be a homage to the late Harrison who passed in 2001 from cancer, as well as to John Lennon, who was ignobly murdered in 1980.  Sadly, the song doesn’t even come close to a George Harrison lead—honestly I thought they were played and then dubbed in by Jimmy the Sound Engineer. To call them “riffs” is generous… they are literally a couple of sliding notes that sounded like George was bored before voluntarily scrapping them for better ideas Back in the Day. In other words, they should have either stayed as scraps on the cutting room floor, or else they should have found better George outtakes. Not much of a tribute to George here.


Add to the mix a string section that Paul McCartney arranged with none-other that Giles Martin, son of their legendary producer George Martin. Of course it was flawless—think “Strawberry Fields,” “Yesterday,” or “Eleanor Rigby.” Okay, maybe not that flawless, but arguably the best parts of the new song.


As a Beatles song— “Now and Then,” I’m saddened to say, is not even up to the standards of “Free as a Bird” and “Real Love,” the two songs that were pieced together and released with the Beatles “Anthology” collection beginning in November of 1995. While those two did pale in comparison to the previous “last music” the Beatles wrote and/or released, “Abbey Road” and “Let it Be,” they were still "Beatle-y" enough to have been hotly anticipated and to warrant huge ratings when "Free As a Bird" was released in the Fall of 1995, and "Real Love" the following year. They were still poignant enough to have caused more than a few tears to be shed over the concept of hearing a new Beatles song for the first time in what was then over a twenty-five year gap in new Beatles songs—a generation's worth of years which had hitherto thought to have been permanent.


In all, MEH. Yoko could have kept that cassette hidden and the world wouldn’t have missed out on a thing. "Now and Then" should have been "Was and When," as in "was" good "when" the Beatles were actually the Beatles. And now I’m sad.






© Ray Cattie

Saturday, June 25, 2022

Bootes and Hattie (sung to “Changes” by David Bowie)

Still don't know what you were, sniffing for
And your time was running short, you had to make a poop and,

Every time you thought you, found a spot

It seemed the spot was, not so sweet

So you kept on, sniffing,

You were searching for that, much-used stain,

There on the rug you chose to squat, ‘cause,

It’s much too late to, stop that train


B-B-B-Bootes and Hattie!

(Turn and face your Mom)

Or your Daddy

(Don't want to have to ask again)

B-B-B-Bootes and Hattie

(Turn and face your Mom)

Or your Daddy

(Just gonna have to find a different spot)

Poop may need be

But you can't poop there 


I sense the ripples, move your bowels,

Don’t do it, on the rug, too hard to clean it up and,

Though the poops float through your guts,

And still the cramps are getting worse,

But these carpets, that you shit on

As we, try to keep them clean,

Are not immune to your, smelly movements,

They're quite aware that poop is,  coming soon


B-B-B-Bootes and Hattie!

(Turn and face your Dad)

Or your Mommy

(Don't want to have to, ask again)

B-B-B-Bootes and Hattie

(Turn and face your Dad)

Or your Mommy

(Just gonna have to find a, different spot)

Poop may need be,

But you can't poop there 


Strong need, of pooping, is cramping you

Poops, are a-coming,

the place you’re not suppose to


B-B-B-Bootes and Hattie!

(Turn and face your Mom)

Or your Daddy

(Don't want to have to, ask again)

B-B-B-Bootes and Hattie

(Turn and face your Dad)

Or your Mommy 

(Just gonna have to find a, different spot)

Poop may need be,

But you can't poop there

I said that poop may need be,

But you can't poop there


-sax outro-